Seanus
Admin1
2007 - CBR1000RR
Posts: 2,218
|
Post by Seanus on Jan 14, 2005 20:33:51 GMT 10
Model Name:
VTR1000F
Engine Type:
Liquid-cooled 4-stroke 8-valve DOHC 90°V-twin
Bore x Stroke:
98 x 66mm
Displacement:
996cm3
Compression Ratio:
9.4 : 1
Carburettor(s):
48mm slanted flat-slide CV-type x 2
Maximum Power:
110PS/9,000rpm (DIN) (81kW/9,000min-1)
Maximum Torque:
9.8kg-m/7,000rpm (DIN) (96Nm/7,000min-1)
Ignition:
Computer-controlled digital transistorized with electronic advance
Starter:
Electric
Transmission:
6-speed
Final Drive:
'O'-ring sealed chain
Dimensions (mm):
2,055 x 705 x 1,155mm[/b]
Wheel Base (mm):
1,430mm
Seat Height (mm):
810mm
Ground Clearance (mm):
130mm
Fuel Capacity (litres):
16 or 19 Litres
Front Wheel:
Hollow-section triple-spoke cast aluminium
Rear Wheel:
Hollow-section triple-spoke cast aluminium
Front Tyre:
120/70-ZR17 (58W) (Radial)
Rear Tyre:
180/55-ZR17 (73W) (Radial)
Front Suspension:
41mm H.M.A.S. cartridge-type fork with adjustable spring preload and rebound damping, 109mm axle travel
Rear Suspension:
Pro-Link with preload and rebound damping-adjustable gas-charged H.M.A.S. damper, 124mm axle travel
Front Brakes:
296mm dual hydraulic discs with 4-piston calipers and sintered metal pads
Rear Brakes:
220mm single hydraulic disc with single-piston caliper and sintered metal pads
Changes to the 2001 model and beyond
- Additional 3 litres fuel, now 19 litres
- New instruments, LCD readout to right with odo, trip, time, temp and fuel
- New handlebar angle, slightly flatter
- Damping revalve for forks
- Shock has rebound damping adjustment
- Electronic security built into ignition lock
- New type of battery
- Minor carb and ignition mods
- New indicators
- Black gloss finish wheels
- Black top triple clamp
- Black brake callipers
|
|
|
|
Post by vtrstunter on Jan 19, 2005 1:29:44 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by vtrraider on Jan 19, 2005 8:18:02 GMT 10
not to mention the introduction of the best colour in 02.... The Matt Back.. lol   Matt Black??? You mean Primer don't you  |
|
|
|
Post by musty on Feb 6, 2005 15:10:33 GMT 10
Model Name:VTR1000FMaximum Power:110PS/9,000rpm (DIN) (81kW/9,000min-1) now thats real funny My 1987 GPX750R has 106PS, guess one day you younguns will try real power Musty heads for the corner  |
|
|
|
Post by quindaddy on Apr 26, 2005 23:07:27 GMT 10
now thats real funny My 1987 GPX750R has 106PS, guess one day you younguns will try real power Musty heads for the corner Aye and my 1994 ZXR750 (modified) had a lot more than that, hehe but thats not whats its all about is it? Also exactly how much does a GPX750R weigh? Probably more than a VTR if only because your engine has at least 30% more moving parts Sheesh Musty what are you doing hiding in here m8? Isnt Twincam.org and KSRC enough for you? LOL |
|
|
|
Post by roadrunfr on Aug 2, 2005 22:23:21 GMT 10
You'd think I'm an idiot but is there a difference between PS and HP ?  We talk about "CV DIN" in france ..... 110PS is at the crank I presume .... |
|
|
|
Post by dale on Aug 2, 2005 23:04:48 GMT 10
You'd think I'm an idiot but is there a difference between PS and HP ? We talk about "CV DIN" in france ..... 110PS is at the crank I presume .... There is a difference. Here's a neat conversion site.... www.mr2ownersclub.com/converter.htm |
|
|
|
Post by roadrunfr on Aug 3, 2005 2:38:01 GMT 10
 The international unit is W. 1 PS (german) = 735.49875 W 1 HP (US) = 745.7 W 1 CV (French) = 1 PS 1 CV or CH = This is a French unit for automobile power. The symbol ch is short for chevaux ("horses"). Some sources give it as 735.5 W, but it is generally used interchangeably with the German 'PS'. So 110 PS = 110 CV = 108.5 HP = 80.9 Kw
|
|
|
|
Post by shifty on Oct 13, 2005 7:45:04 GMT 10
Out of interest I have a blue 03 model and it has gold calipers, not black as suggested above. And it's not just a one-off as a friend has exactly the same colour scheme.
|
|
|
|
Post by vtrraider on Oct 13, 2005 7:57:29 GMT 10
The VTR went from Gold coloured calipers, to black in '01, then back to gold again in '03. All the same caliper, just different colour.
The triple clamps went from silver in '97 - '00, to black in '01, then I think they went to some weird magnesium gold colour.
I know the brake master cylinder was the old fashioned rectangle type from '04 (same as the CBR600F).
|
|
|
|
Post by shifty on Oct 13, 2005 13:55:04 GMT 10
Any other changes in the 03 model or purely cosmetic?
|
|
|
|
Post by detlef on Nov 3, 2005 12:48:24 GMT 10
Just to add to the story, the German PS stands for Pferde Starke, which is literally Horse Power.
|
|
|
|
Post by shifty on Nov 18, 2005 9:03:55 GMT 10
Anyone know where the rev limiter is? The redline on the tacho on my 03 is 9500rpm...
|
|
|
|
Post by apexer on Mar 24, 2006 6:55:25 GMT 10
vtr1000fv 1997 yellow carbs bored from 49 to 52mm heads scimmed 15 thou ignition advanced 1.89 deg hot spark conversion one off exhaust k&n filter rejetted on dyno manual cct's( made by me) now gives 124bhp and a wopping 138ftlbs torque rear sub frame modified for pipe all electrics units moved and rewired stealth discs front rear goodridge pipes geomics altered ( 6mm spacer on rear shock mounting) shod her in michelins pilot roads handles like a dream goes like stink just awaiting new shed so i can respray her spaces.msn.com/firestormriders/PersonalSpace.aspx?_c02_owner=1 |
|
shayne
Omnipresent
1998 Blueprint
Posts: 8,639
|
Post by shayne on Mar 26, 2006 15:26:55 GMT 10
G'day apexer,
Your horsepower seems about right I would think, but that torque figure is very high.
I would have thought that boring the carbs would do the opposite, and increase power and lower torque. What do you attribute this torque figure to?
With the heads machined, what did your static compression work out to?
By what method did you advance the timing, and does this cause detonation with the increased compression ratio?
What is your ignition mod you refer to as "hot spark"
|
|
|
|
Post by apexer on Mar 27, 2006 7:15:51 GMT 10
sorry typing error should read 128 not 138 timing was altered by having a new pulse rotor made by a good friend never bothered to work out static compression as front head was warped so you have to have the heads matched had detenation when it was running lean , now its rejetted. the hotspark conversion is where u remove the resitor from the plug cap and replace it with a piece of metal this gives back the power the resistor robs and i have the " splitfire" module fitted which turns one spark into 5 sprks this increases and smooths the burn which gives more power and smoother delivery, the carbs are taper bored which increases the velocity stack affect and atomises the fuel better
|
|
shayne
Omnipresent
1998 Blueprint
Posts: 8,639
|
Post by shayne on Mar 27, 2006 8:36:01 GMT 10
You don't have a dyno sheet you could post up by any chance do you?
I would love to see that torque curve. 80ft/lb is pretty good, but 128 must provide some real grunt.
|
|
|
|
Post by apexer on Mar 28, 2006 4:30:35 GMT 10
its great out of corners wot was 3rd gr you can now do in 4th and nearly always with the front grabbing air never printed one off sould have done in hin-sight but was to busy fiddling with it
|
|
|
|
Post by mcmastermind on May 17, 2007 13:47:11 GMT 10
Out of interest I have a blue 03 model and it has gold calipers, not black as suggested above. And it's not just a one-off as a friend has exactly the same colour scheme. Yeah i have a blue '03 model with gold calipers too. go the blue! |
|
bluestorm04
The Hedge
2012 GSX1300R + 2007 GSX-R1000
Posts: 3,334
|
Post by bluestorm04 on May 17, 2007 14:04:07 GMT 10
04's have gold calipers also.
|
|
|
|
Post by colinlinz on May 17, 2007 20:57:59 GMT 10
G'day apexer, Your horsepower seems about right I would think, but that torque figure is very high. I would have thought that boring the carbs would do the opposite, and increase power and lower torque. What do you attribute this torque figure to? With the heads machined, what did your static compression work out to? By what method did you advance the timing, and does this cause detonation with the increased compression ratio? What is your ignition mod you refer to as "hot spark" Just because I'm a pedantic bastard. Horsepower and torque are directly related. Torque times RPM divided by 5252 is the formula. |
|
|
|
Post by poomba on May 30, 2007 10:16:44 GMT 10
G'day apexer, Your horsepower seems about right I would think, but that torque figure is very high. I would have thought that boring the carbs would do the opposite, and increase power and lower torque. What do you attribute this torque figure to? With the heads machined, what did your static compression work out to? By what method did you advance the timing, and does this cause detonation with the increased compression ratio? What is your ignition mod you refer to as "hot spark" Just because I'm a pedantic bastard. Horsepower and torque are directly related. Torque times RPM divided by 5252 is the formula. For peak torque, but the curve is where it's at. The bloke earlier boasting about his gsxr 750 may have the same horse power, but take a look at the power curve. the VTR's front wheel is in the air at 4000rpm, the gsxr wont move until about 9000rpm, peak torque and power are only any good when you can use it effeciently. I built a twin turbo 4L drag car (i build cars in my spare time) that made 580kw @ 6300rpm (only revved to 7500)... try driving that on the street. spluttered like a pig on anything before 3500rpm. on the same note, before buying the VTR i test rode a CBR600 'o6 model. great bike, but did nothing before 12000rpm. the torque curve made it boring unless you rung it's neck... same goes with the gixser's |
|
|
|
Post by colinlinz on May 30, 2007 17:45:12 GMT 10
That was the biggest problem with Aprlia's cube motogp bike. It made plenty of power, but it wasn't easily used.
F1 are getting around this with software and torque by wire throttles. The motors would be very difficult to drive by normal throttle, but with a computer operating the throttle and software managing the engine 10% extra throttle application equates to 10% more torque.
|
|
|
|
Post by nighthawk on Oct 18, 2007 19:47:11 GMT 10
The international unit is W. 1 PS (german) = 735.49875 W 1 HP (US) = 745.7 W 1 CV (French) = 1 PS 1 CV or CH = This is a French unit for automobile power. The symbol ch is short for chevaux ("horses"). Some sources give it as 735.5 W, but it is generally used interchangeably with the German 'PS'. So 110 PS = 110 CV = 108.5 HP = 80.9 Kw errr I never was any good at math #crazy# |
|
|
|
Post by turbo on Dec 12, 2007 14:39:49 GMT 10
Anyone know where the rev limiter is? The redline on the tacho on my 03 is 9500rpm... I think it's about 12,000rpm. I got it to 11,900rpm and it still hadn't kicked in! |
|
|
|
Post by colinlinz on Dec 12, 2007 16:23:40 GMT 10
No idea. I hit it enough at QLD raceway, but usually to busy to look at anything other than the track. I wouldn't have thought it to be much over 10'000, but there you go.
|
|
|
|
Post by Torquescheap on Dec 13, 2007 18:01:54 GMT 10
I thought the power starts to drop off after 9000rpm, so it would be better to change gear and be in the peak torque range. Just my thoughts, whats your?
|
|
|
|
Post by colinlinz on Dec 13, 2007 18:25:28 GMT 10
I thought the power starts to drop off after 9000rpm, so it would be better to change gear and be in the peak torque range. Just my thoughts, whats your? True enough. Mine was still going hard, and not really sounding like it was reving that hard, which was why it caught me out. |
|
|
|
Post by squidlyantix on May 26, 2008 19:08:49 GMT 10
Anyone know where the rev limiter is? The redline on the tacho on my 03 is 9500rpm... I think it's about 12,000rpm. I got it to 11,900rpm and it still hadn't kicked in! idk whats up there .. i do know i have been messin around with sprockets and cams to pull some extra torque .. and mine only moved from 97 to 98 .. a little confused at the 11,9 |
|
|
|
Post by chickenisme on May 26, 2008 19:50:03 GMT 10
I was sure the rev limit is meant to be 10,500rpm or there abouts, 11,900 sounds way to high. Does anyone know what actually does the rev limiting (I thought it was something with fuel supply but how?)
|
|
